Greatajax.com

I am so good

Mark — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:15:00 GMT

After a mere 12 hours of labor, the iste is somewhat back up. We are now running on Windows Server 2008 64 bit, SQL server 2008 64 bit, and Community Server 2008.5. I am amazed that I was able to move the old content over so smoothly. I am definitely getting better at this. The new server is built form the guts of my old desktop, an AMD x2 3800, with 3 gig of RAM. Performance appears to be MUCH improved thus far.

I still have some work to do with setting up the proper redirects and getting the greatajax.com mail server running, but I can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that 4 years of content is not completely lost.

Potential temporary death of the blog

Mark — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:13:00 GMT

I know this will come as a shock to my vast readership, but my blog may be coming offline for a while. The reason being that I have just received the necessary parts to build myself a new PC. So, very soon, my existing gaming PC will be rebuilt as the server for this blog. Ultimately, this means faster load times, which has been a serious issue of late.

However, I am concerned about how exactly I will port the blog over onto Windows Server 2008. There is a possibility that with a new machine, I will have to start fresh. I believe I will be able to get all the old content over, but I may well get sick of the process before I can figure it out.

No matter what happens, rest assured, I will be back and I promise to be more annoying and obnoxious than ever before.

Christmas party debacle

Mark — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:04:00 GMT

This year Time Warner offered a Karaoke contest to liven up the annual christmas party, and I made the mistake of signing up. My thought process was that I was able to score well in Rock Band singing, so as long as I stuck to a song I could do well in Rock Band, I should be OK. So I made my selection: Interstate Love Song by Stone Temple Pilots.

I knew from the first note that my voice was ... well ... not as good as I thought. I suppose I'd never heard it amplified so loud. And singing in front of 500 of my coworkers was an unnerving experience to say the least. But, I can take comfort in the fact that others were far worse.

Like the hike on Precipice trail, I consider this experience to be of a character building nature, helping me to overcome the sometimes overwhelming nervousness that sets in when one has to perform in front of a large group of people.

And my new years resolution will be to take singing lessons, so I can sign up again next year and win.

Week of concerts and illness

Mark — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:19:00 GMT

The summer concert season was dismal, so I made up for it last week by attending 3 concerts. Of course, musicians don't come to Maine any more, so I had to drive to Mass for them.

First was Nine Inch Nails at the DCU center in Worcester Mass. If you know me, you know that NIN is my second favorite band after Tool. The last two albums haven't been as good as previous material, but are still better than 95% of the garbage out there today. The show itself was amazing. Trent Reznor is a perfectionist and it shows, from the overwhelming light show to the superb sound quality.

The crowd, however, was a bit sub par. Out on the floor, there seemed to be a great divide between those who did not want to be touched in any way, and those who wanted to break some noses in the mosh pit. The moshers were more annoying than ever, often choosing to mock the slow instrumental "ghosts" songs by moshing to them. Several mosh kiddies got ejected early on and that issue seemed to abate, however. On the other end of the spectrum, there was the annoying girl who would stomp on your foot if you happened to bump into her. Worse, at one point in the evening I felt an elbow in my back, which is not unusual - but this one kept pushing me into the girl in front of me. When I turned around, I recoiled at the sight of what had to be the 300 pound leader of the neo-nazis giving me an icy blue death gaze. Investigation revealed that I had somehow pissed off his girlfriend, but thankfully I was able to resolve the situation with some quick-thinking diplomacy.

One obnoxious side effect of the show was that I contracted a cold and I am still suffering under its adverse effects.But it did not stop me from dragging a similarly infected Mike down to Boston later in the week for 2 nights of concerts.

On friday night we went to the Paradise Rock Club to see Bang Camaro, who I've come to love from playing their music in Rock Band. This is a band that plays what could loosely be described as "80's cock rock". The founders claim to have expunged all the boring bits from that genre, while keeping everything that makes it great. In practice, this means the elimination of verses (choruses only) and a lot more guitar solos. Their lyrics are amusing, minimalist and abstract riffs on themes of sex, drugs, rock n roll, and fighting. One song, Swallow the Razor, repeats the lines "Hell bent, hell bent for liquor / wines fine but whiskey's quicker / I chop my breakfast on a mirror / swallow the razor!" over and over. These lyrics are sung by a chorus of men ever changing in number, but I counted 9 of them at the show we attended.

The venue itself made the night special. The Paradise is tiny, holding maybe 500 people. No matter where I stood, whether in front of the stage, or up on a balcony, I felt like I was right next to the band. I was also impressed, for the most part, with the opening acts. Leslie came out first and did some solid southern rock, followed by the very strange That Handsome Devil, sporting a super charismatic lead singer who was a joy to watch. THD threw condoms into the crowd, and a girl behind me gave me one, but I did not get laid. The final opening act, Hooray For Earth, was about as lame as one would expect with a name like that.

But none of them approached the glory of Bang Camaro itself. This is a band that is out there to have fun, and it shows. I saw quite a few of the singers out on the floor pounding beers during the opening acts, and some of them were so drunk i thought there would be some on-stage vomiting. The guitarists both kicked ass and did a great job of keeping the crowd pumped up through a long set that didn't end until 1 in the morning. If Mike and I hadn't been so exhausted, I'm sure we could have stuck around and partied with those guys. That's what's nice about seeing smaller acts. I really can't recommend Bang Camaro enough.

The following night, we went to the Wang Theatre to see the Smashing Pumpkins. The Wang is a nifty little venue too, made for stage productions, with high frescoed ceilings and vertigo-inducing balconies, probably seating a couple thousand. I had seen the Pumpkins maybe ten years ago and I was not impressed back then. Billy Corgan had railed at the audience for their boredom at his endless hippy space jams, berating them for only enjoying his hits. But I thought, maybe in ten years Billy has come to realize that people only like music that THEY ARE ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH. I was mistaken. This show was still better than the last, as even the obscure material he played was more structured into real songs. But he must have played every unreleased B side he's ever written, along with what I consider to be some of the worst of his older material (Cupid de Locke, really?). The few hits he played, seemed to be deliberately sped up so he could get back to the less focused psychedelic rock. The sound, too, was not fantastic, though it might have been the balcony seats we had.

I did enjoy the show, don't get me wrong. Billy Corgan is a genius songwriter and has put out some truly unique and amazing songs over the past 20 years. I also appreciated that there was no opening act, and that the Pumpkins played for 2 and a half hours, which is a lot longer than most headliners are willing to get up there for. I just long to hear the songs I know, and Billy is way too self-indulgent to give that to me. I'm sure that's why the Pumpkins are playing a 2000 seat venue rather than a 10000 seat arena like their peers NIN.

Obama Derangement Syndrome

Mark — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:13:00 GMT

I am certainly depressed about the election results. While we are already a partially socialist country, and have already largely forgotten the philosophy of our founders, and while John McCain was no alternative to socialism himself, an Obama presidency will no doubt bring us even deeper into the politics of extortion and redistribution.

While Obama is a believer in collectivism, he had to hide those beliefs to get elected. Similarly, democrats on the whole refuse to admit their desire to foist socialism upon us, even as they enact socialist legislation. The only place where collectivist politics are openly advocated is in academia, which is increasingly turning into a balkanized mockery of itself. The populace on the whole understand that socialism has failed wherever it has been tried, so those politicians that advocate such ideas must do so stealthily and incrementally. Hence, Obama runs as a tax cutter, though he voted for nearly every tax increase that crossed his desk as a senator, and though he promises massive increases in the federal bureaucracy (in the end, such programs will be paid for by inflation of the currency or a VAT tax - 80% of the income tax increases on the hated "rich" will be paying for the the new tax credit welfare system for the 40% of Americans who don't pay income taxes currently but are still scheduled for their "tax cut").

These facts indicate that Obama will probably act slowly to implement leftist changes. Hopefully, he is more motivated by obtaining power than by ideology - if so, he will certainly abandon much of his platform in the name of pragmatism, and perhaps end up a second Bill Clinton. Regardless, the world is not going to end. Europe and Canada are much farther advanced toward socialism than we are, and they have not yet disintegrated (though France is getting close). It took many generations for Rome to decline. We are still the worlds strongest nation and there is no way that will change any time soon. We are merely entering the climax of an embarassing phase in which we repudiate our own strength and seek to fit in politically with our obvious inferiors.

Meanwhile, I will continue to believe in and fight for "a government of laws and not of men", even as the law is made ever more malleable and incomprehensible in the hands of the statists. I will continue to fight for the individual's right to his own life, even as "self-sacrifice" is turned into a cardinal and enforceable virtue. I will continue trying to amass wealth, though such a course might ultimately turn me into a scapegoat for the democratic mob, fueled by envy into class warfare, the same kind of "change" that ruined classical Athens and brought the Nazis to power (the Jews had all the money, according to populist rhetoric of the day).

While this blog has been good training for me, it does not get a wide audience, nor would I want it to. Nor is the tone of this blog acceptable for wider publication. I often allow my disgust at the left to show through here, because this is my personal site and those are my personal feelings. But I always supply the relevant facts that lead to my feelings, and I always strive to place those facts into full context. In writing for the wider audience, any feelings of disgust I have for Obama and his bankrupt philosophy should be entirely left out, with only the facts of a single, important issue presented as cogently as possible, so that the resulting conclusions are inevitable to the reader. I think I can do that.

I can't start today though, because Obama has been revising his platform, and has finally taken it down for a complete overhaul. Because, once you get elected, that's when the REAL platform is supposed to be revealed, right?

Buying stocks amid the "financial crisis"

Mark — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:36:00 GMT

I bought some Corning (GLW) options today with an expiration date in April, to supplement my holdings of the still freefalling NVDA. I desperately wanted to buy NVDA options, but after my recent capital depreciation, I will no longer leverage myself in a primary holding. And there are so many good buys out there right now that its not hard to find a deal.

I don't know when this crisis will end, and I certainly can't say for certain that it will end by April of next year. What I do know is that Corning is a very solid and well-run company with a strong balance sheet and much growth potential. And it's stock has been hammered by 50% from where I once judged it to be a good buy, making it a REALLY good buy. Intel also looks good, as does Cisco. And Bank of America is paying out roughly 11% in dividends!

I roll the dice on the options because the bulk of my savings is in a 401K plan that goes into a very low fee S&P 500 index fund. I highly recommend the Fidelity Spartan 500 fund, it's got a cost drag of 10 cents per 100 dollars (E-Trade and Vanguard have similarly low cost index funds). Cost drag is the most important thing to look for in a mutual fund - as the effects of cost drag (which is often as high as 1-2 dollars in actively managed funds) can easily kill your compounded annual return over an extended period of time.

Past performance of a fund tells you NOTHING. The fact is, managed funds often do well when there is less capital in them, because the manager can act nimbly, but as market-beating performance brings in more and more customers year after year, it becomes very difficult to pair the action of buying the stocks with the commitment to buy. Buying has to be done a bit at a time, and the mere act of initiating a buy position will cause others to begin the pile-on, raising the price of the stock before enough capital can even be sunk into it. If you MUST buy a managed fund, try to buy one that has 20 billion dollars or less of capital.

Obama and Ayers

Mark — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:56:00 GMT

Well, I am glad that the McCain campaign is finally bringing up Obama's association with Bill Ayers, a man who should have been executed a long time ago for treasonous military activity within this country on behalf of our enemies (of course, in today's climate of cultural self-loathing, he is instead a respected university professor). I highly doubt, however, that McCain and Palin will make all the necessary connections, so I write this post.

Yes, it is certainly reprehensible for Obama to have created what is best termed a political alliance with Bill Ayers, though I am sure that Obama is being honest when he says he does not condone Ayers' terrorist activities (that he wasn't aware of such activities is a laughable assertion, however).

But the real problem is not that Ayers was a terrorist; it's that he was, and is, a Marxist, dedicated to overthrowing this country, once by violent means, now by peaceful means. To that end, Ayers worked extensively with Obama in the Annenburg foundation to subvert education into something more akin to marxist indoctrination. Ayers has been very open in believing that the education system must be used as a political tool. Money to Annenburg was put to use by Obama for the kinds of programs that Ayers wanted: promotion of "social justice" (the poor must eat the rich) and "african-american studies" (creating a feeling of victimhood in students that must be addressed politically) in particular. Now, perhaps Obama is just a dupe of men like Ayers, who seek to turn schools into moral and political re-education camps, rather than teaching children reading, writing, and arithmetic (which is all just a control system of the bourgeouisie, in such mens minds). Perhaps Obama is unable to make the mental leap from abstract principle to concrete program, and it is merely coincidence that his entire campaign platform regarding education is an obvious furtherance of the work of Marxist thinkers like Ayers. But I doubt it.

Obama has merely learned to keep his principles close to the vest, rather than risk alienating voters by admitting his ideology. But his relationship with Ayers (and Jeremiah Wright) is quite instructive on what those principles must be.

Understanding the financial crisis

Mark — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:39:00 GMT

Journalism has become an intellectually lazy profession, and nowhere is this more evident than in economic reporting. One would think a journalist who covers the economy would go out and get a degree in economics, or at least spend some time to gain a slightly more than rudimentary understanding of the subject; unfortunately, this is not so.

Rather than regale you with the stupidity of the mass media regarding the current financial crisis, let me show you what the Internet can do for us when we search out actual Economists online who are vastly knowledgeable and can make a compelling argument:

First, here is Don Luskin, asking a simple question: why is the government seeking 700 billion dollars to guarantee 521 billion dollars in mortgages? Would a "professional" journalist actually take the time to determine the sum total of all mortgages the way Luskin did? It's an incredibly informative article and it must be read.

Now, if you are a product of modern education, you might have trouble with this next one. It's George Reisman on the exact mechanisms by which the current crisis has unfolded, and how far it is capable of going. His descriptions of leverage and credit contractions, which are very difficult abstractions, are incredibly clear and concise (but they do demand intense focus regardless). You will feel much smarter after reading this piece.

Now, compare those two pieces with what you read in the paper or saw on the news today.

Why I will vote for McCain

Mark — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:51:00 GMT

I've previously said that I'll probably vote McCain because I will take the pro-America socialist over the anti-America socialist any day. But that's an oversimplification; my reasoning is more complicated than that.

I've learned, in talking to people amid the recent Sarah Palin hooplah, that there is great concern on the left that we are drifting toward something like theocracy. Sarah Palin once invoked the name of God in a speech, after all. Since I am an atheist, many leftists wonder why I would vote for a republican, given this coming theocracy.

I must admit, such reasoning befuddles me, for I see more of what I would call "theocracy" in Barack Obama or any leftist for that matter, than in the right.

Obama may not claim that his positions are inspired by God, or invoke the name of God in enacting his platform upon us, but his platform is theocracy insofar as he will be using the power of government to enforce his morality upon the rest of us. That morality, of course, is altruism. And in nearly every policy prescription, Obama promises to make us all into altruists, whether we like it or not.

Under Obama, schools will become indoctrination centers to form young minds into the altruist mold, by forcing all middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of community service a year. College students will be given 4000 dollars a year to perform 100 hours of community service per year (40 dollars an hour, thats very generous of you, Obama!). Undoubtedly, the work these students do will be of benefit to Obama, the democrats, and the ever expanding welfare state. Obama will also turn college work-study programs into "public service" programs. Similarly, at the low end, Obama will start getting the state involved in children's lives from birth to age 5, and though the details of this venture have not been fleshed out, you can be assured that it will involve a lot of taxpayer money and that service to others will be actively promoted (probably with a lot of forced "sharing", it's a great way to prepare the kid to give up his earnings to the taxman later in life).

Once a student has been fully brainwashed into the insane belief that morality is nothing more than putting the needs of others ahead of ones own, they must be given some way to work that does not involve the greedy and selfish capitalist "rat-race". Obama has foreseen this challenge and will begin his restructuring of our economy on collectivist-altruist lines by expanding the "AmeriCorps", another wasteful leftist program that gives money to people so that they might "volunteer" to "selflessly" serve others, from 75,000 to 250,000 people.

Now, most of the preceding two paragraphs describe how Obama wants to force us to think like altruists. I could, of course, write volumes on how he wants to force us to act like altruists, but I will limit myself to a few of his most egregious plans.

Obviously, the rich will be forced to pay more taxes under Obama, via rollback of the Bush tax cuts, increased capital gains tax, increased corporate tax rate, and a potentially massive increase in the social security tax aimed at those making more than 250K. But once you've gone through an Obama-approved curriculum, you will defintely be amenable to these changes.

Additionally, Obama will work to appropriate more and more taxpayer money to socialize our economy. Starting with health care, of course, because how can a person argue when their money is being taken from them to pay for a poor disabled girl's operation? Then its the energy companies, who will be given massive amounts of taxpayer money in exchange for falling in line with bureacratic dictates. Then the automobile makers, who will be told what kind of cars to build, and how many (I'm sure this will do wonders for their bottom line - but we love a good bailout, don't we?).

This list goes on and on, and I grow tired of reciting it.

So, on the one hand, we have Obama, with a comprehensive plan on how to indoctrinate children into a morality, and then enact that morality into a comprehensive legal framework that will involve massive state control of our lives to insure compliance. And on the other hand, we have people who believe in forcing their morality on us by ... possibly restricting the right to have an abortion. Now, I am all in favor of abortion, but I'm also big into context. And in the larger picture, McCain-Palin might not be perfect, but they are obviously willing to allow me to continue to live my life selfishly. They might believe in altruism, as most people do, but they also have some understanding that people have the right to choose what to do with their earnings.

So, yeah, I'm voting McCain-Palin. The alternative is frightening.

Bayside 2008

Mark — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:23:00 GMT

Visiting with my parents at their rented summer cottage in Northport is now an annual tradition. This year, I had the advantage of knowing the area a little better, given my work has taken me to Belfast, Bucksport, and beyond with some regularity. And as an added bonus/curse, I was under a deadline to bring up an optical network in the Downeast area (Calais to Bucksport) by this friday. This meant I was able to work during the day and stay with my parents overnight, rather than get a hotel room or drive 2 or more hours home every night.

But before the work began, Hank, Harriet, and I spent some time together over labor day weekend, culminating in a jaunt to Acadia on Labor Day. Again we ate at Jordan Pond restaurant and enjoyed their excellent popovers and superior service. And again, I endeavored to climb the Precipice trail - the most difficult hiking trail at Acadia (it's actually referred to as a "non-technical climbing trail"). Last year, I had been given a 45 minute time limit by the folks, and was unable to complete the climb. This year I was given carte blanche while they drove off to a bookstore in the interim.

Hikers are warned that people have died on the trail, and that it should not be attempted if one has any fear of heights whatsoever. Since I am afraid of heights, I saw this as the perfect opportunity to do a bit of character building. I had been a bit nervous at times last year, but the lower section is mostly a rock scramble, climbing over and under huge boulders and slabs with only minor risk of injury.

I was unprepared for what awaited me. The grade gets steeper and steeper as one ascends, until the right side of the trail is a sheer drop to certain death. The trail thins and a short iron guide rail is the only thing between your foot and hundreds of feet of air.

None of the photos here are mine - I forgot all about taking pictures after a certain point.

Those hand-rail sections weren't as bad - knowing I have a redundant set of limbs to keep me from disaster is quite a confidence booster. And here's another shot - the blue stripe is the trail marker, yes:

There are places more difficult than those pictured here. The mixture of mortal terror with enjoyment of the scenery is an interesting one that rivals any roller coaster. I put on a brave face and joked with the foreign tourists (who abound in Acadia) about the trails bodycount and the likelihood of any of us being able to save the other. My greatest fear was that I would have to go back down the way I came, but thankfully, on reaching the barren, windbeaten top of Champlain mountain, the trail maps guided me to a slightly easier descent.

That night, when I laid in bed and closed my eyes, all I could picture was that incredible view, and my ankles would feel weak as the memory of how easy it would have been to fall right into it. Thrice as I drifted off to sleep, I had the feeling of letting go, and jerked suddenly awake, limbs twitching and flailing. I haven't overcome my fear of heights, obviously. Some people would make that climb without a second thought, and I envy them. I don't know if I would do it again.

The problem with Deadwood

Mark — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:25:00 GMT

I love the show, don't get me wrong. It's got rich characters with evolving motivations, and some of the most clever dialogue I've ever heard. I miss it a lot, now that I've seen all 3 seasons.

But the shows portrayal of George Hearst disturbs me. Most characters in the show are very very loosely based on a real life counterpart, and Hearst is no exception. I can allow for some artistic leeway.But Hearst, from the history I have read of him, was a self-made man who brought himself from rags to riches by the honest sweat of his brow. In the show Deadwood, however, Hearst is an evil man, so bent on controlling every ounce of gold in his purview that he will murder those who oppose his designs willy-nilly. Nor is he averse, in the show, to a hands-on approach: in one episode he crushes Swearingen's hand with a pickaxe; in another, he spits on an underlings face and threatens the man should he dare wipe it off.

This is an ugly way to honor a great man. But this kind of treatment is common in Hollywood, which is still in thrall to a Marxist world-view. Anyone who has something must have taken it by force from someone else. Marxists cannot understand that a man like Hearst can create value. This despite the fact that these Hollywood leftists live in a society where even the poorest can obtain riches that dwarf kings of yore, and a world in which more men are alive than have died in all of previous human history, yet fewer starve. These facts and others stare them in the face, but they continue to believe that the wealthy are plunderers, and they continue to make shows and movies designed to promote this fiction. If all wealth is plunder, comes the logical conlusion of this view, then the government should control it completely and make sure its doled out equally to everyone, according to need. It saddens me that our brightest artistic minds actively promote totalitarianism in the face of common sense and all historical evidence.

Joe Biden is Obama's running mate

Mark — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:42:00 GMT

This is the man who, sitting in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the wake of 9/11, said "Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran".

Joe Biden is a buffoon, and a politician through and through, without much in the way of principles, lusting for power. The perfect running mate for Obama, I suppose.

Bought an iPhone

Mark — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:44:00 GMT

and I must say, it is an incredible device. It has a few issues, such as no pictures in text messages, no smiley menu, and iTunes can be obnoxious - I am sorry Apple, but I am not buying music with any DRM on it (go Amazon!). But on the plus side, its got GPS integrated into google maps, my corporate and personal email and calendars seamlessly synced, the best web browsing Ive ever seen in a handheld, automatically finds and connnects to the nearest wifi access point, built-in VPN (and a decent SSH client called iTerm), an amazing touch screen keyboard (though I do sometimes miss not having to even look with the T9 system), and some good games that take advantage of the touch screen and accelerometer. In fact, the graphics on SuperMonkeyBall are as good or better than anything on the DS. Now, let's see some of the DS games ported over and I will really be a happy boy.

It is well worth the 200 dollars. Now the question is, will it be worth the 75-100 dollars a month? Based on current usage, yes.

A painful lesson learned

Mark — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:58:00 GMT

NVDA dropped 30% today on some bad news. This has reduced the value of my portfolio by over 80%. I've had to sell shares to make the margin call. I still own some, however, as well as a huge pile of now nearly worthless options.

So, the first thing to do is reassess my position. I still believe in NVDA and I still believe it is undervalued. There is more competitive pressure from AMD than I had anticipated, and fabrication issues have caused the recall of 2-300 million dollars worth of their laptop chips, something I could not have anticipated. News like this is pure poison in today's bear market, and one can see the results. However, the long term picture is good and NVDA's P/E ratio is laughably low, so I will happily hold on to my remaining shares.

The second thing to do is find some value in this by learning my lesson. And the lesson is one that I have heard options traders propound many times, which I failed to heed. When your options lose half their value, sell them. As NVDA dropped, I stopped even watching my options, so confident was I that the stock would quickly rebound. Now, even a large rebound will likely not make me my money back (though they expire in september, so there's a glimmer of hope).

I doubled down as NVDA lost value, unwisely dipping into margin that would be covered by the same stock that I was borrowing to buy more of. Now, margin can be a useful tool, but I think my second lesson here is that it should be backed by securities other than the one you are buying, so that a huge dip of this nature is less likely to cause such damage. And hand in hand with this, while I still believe that the eggs should not be in too many baskets, from now on I will always own more than a single stock, if only for tactical reasons.

If I take these lessons to heart, the money lost will not be for naught. Thankfully, I am doing OK professionally, and I was able to move some money over from the bank, and I will continue to do so until I am fully reinvested. I may be a bit worse for wear, but I am eager to put these lessons, as well as others I have learned, to good work. It's still a great time to be an investor for the long term.

The virtue of honesty involves being open about ones failures as well as ones triumphs. Many stock traders will only tell you of their triumphs, but I think the preceding paragraphs are ample illustration that I try very hard not to evade even the most painful realities. And I can take a bit of pride in that, at least.

Stock misery

Mark — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:37:00 GMT

NVDA is down significantly since my last post - I bought in at 21.50, and the stock is now below 19 dollars. Does this mean I am panicking? Well, I won't deny that the desire is there, but now is the time for fortitude. I recommended it at 21.50 and I recommend it even more now. The market as a whole has been hammered, and it would be difficult at this point to find any stock that is not severely undervalued. Corning looks good again, BBT looks great, Intel is back down to reasonable levels, among others.

My NVDA options expire in September, so I am going to sit back and hope that the market as a whole starts to turn around before that time. I think it's overdue at this point. I've sat through this same scenario with Intel and come out very well, and there is plenty of time yet. Still, it's hard not to second guess oneself when one could have sold a few weeks back and doubled ones money.